Showing posts with label shipping. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shipping. Show all posts

Monday, March 26, 2012

UPS buys TNT Express: Strong deliverer

THE “conveyor belt” for global commerce is how Scott Davis, the boss of UPS, describes his company, the world’s biggest express-parcel shipper. On March 19th UPS announced that it would buy TNT Express, a Dutch competitor, for €5.16 billion ($6.8 billion). The deal adds TNT’s hefty regional network to UPS’s vast global one. The merged firm will be much larger than FedEx or DHL, its main rivals (though DHL is part of a larger group).

It is a good time to strike a deal. TNT Express, which split from TNT’s mail-delivery firm last year, has wobbled as the world economy has faltered. Its share price is depressed, but its prospects are not bad. As the world economy revives, package-toters with global networks should thrive.

The big three have the field to themselves. The huge capital costs of building a worldwide network of planes and trucks to ensure swift deliveries of parcels, documents and freight keeps smaller rivals at bay. And the more complete the network, the better customers are served. TNT Express’s business fills a gap in Europe, where UPS lacks a road-freight operation. It also has a struggling business in fast-growing Brazil that UPS reckons it can fix.

Strong growth looks set to resume. Express delivery is enabling smaller firms to run the long global supply chains favoured by big companies, helping everyone to save cash. UPS reckons technology and demography offer plenty more scope for shifting parcels.

First, technology. E-mail may have killed the letter, but online shopping is great for parcel-deliverers. Shifting things bought on the internet is 30% of UPS’s business in America. That jumps to 50% at Christmas and other peak times. And as people everywhere discover the joy of shopping from the sofa, the business has excellent growth prospects. Online shoppers don’t care whether goods come from a few streets away or must be shipped, more profitably, from another continent.

Second, demography. Greying populations seem an unlikely source of profits. Yet to contain spiralling health-care costs, older folk are increasingly receiving treatment at home rather than in hospital. UPS already has a good business ensuring that organs and skin grafts get to hospitals in good time. (Transplant patients prefer not to wait.) The next bonanza, it reckons, will be delivering drugs and medical devices to patients’ doors.

Source: http://www.economist.com/node/21551086

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Maersk Bets on Better Shipping Forecast

Container ships and hurricanes don't mix, as all captains know. But AP Moeller-Maersk is weathering economic squalls well. Despite weak global trade and high fuel prices, shares in the world's largest shipping company are up 25% this year, buoyed by cuts to industry capacity. Now Maersk is merging some of its Asia to Europe services with rival CMA CGM, further reducing capacity. If that enables Maersk to raise freight prices this year, the shares could rise further.

Still, it won't be plain sailing. The industry's order book for new ships—placed in healthier economic climes—is around 30% of the current fleet. Capacity is currently outstripping demand for shipping of finished goods by around 4% annually, forcing shipping groups to cut prices last year. Even after a recovery this year, spot shipping rates from Asia to Europe—the world's busiest route—are around $710 per container box, below the cost of the fuel needed to transport them.

The wind is now changing. The main carriers are aiming to raise prices between Asia and Europe by $600-$900 per container in coming months, an unprecedented hike, notes data specialist Alphaliner. To regain pricing power, Maersk, CMA CGM and MSC are keeping ships in port or cutting routes. Around 7% of market capacity is sitting idle, double the level of a few months ago, already enabling the industry to push through the first rate rises in two years.

Even so, Maersk still trades at around book value. That's in line with Asian rivals China Cosco Holdings and Evergreen Marine, which lack Maersk's oil-rig operating business and stake in oil producer DUC, which act as a partial hedge against rising fuel prices. Yet even a small freight-price increase could buoy its prospects. Each extra 1% rise would add approximately 5% to its 2012 earnings, notes Deutsche Bank. That's something investors might like to take on board.

Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204131004577235363815010118.html?mod=WSJ_Heard_LEFTTopNews

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Freighter Oversupply Weighs on Shipowners and Banks

SINGAPORE — The skyscrapers and immaculate beaches of this seaport look out on one of the world’s largest parking lots: mile after mile of empty cargo ships, as far as the eye can see.

Similar fleets bob at anchor, with empty cargo holds, off the coasts of southeast Malaysia and Hong Kong. And dozens of newly built ships float empty near the giant shipyards of South Korea and China, their owners from all over the world reluctant to accept delivery during one of the worst markets ever for the global shipping industry.

As recently as six weeks ago large freighters that can carry bulk commodities like iron ore or grain were fetching charter rates of $15,000 a day. Now, brokers and owners say, the going rate is $6,000 a day. If any customers can even be found.

Although the fault lies partly with doldrums in the global economy, the bigger factor is a glut of new freighters. The oversupply is putting financial pressure on the shipowners that bought them and the already struggling European banks that financed many of the purchases.

Shipping industry leaders hold little hope of a quick recovery.

“If the tunnel is 2012, I can’t see any light at the end of it,” said Tim Huxley, the chief executive of Wah Kwong Maritime Transport Holdings, a Hong Kong-based shipping line with 29 bulk freighters and tankers.

Back during the global commodity boom, which continued through the spring of 2008, the world’s shipowners could hardly place orders for freighters fast enough. But because of the long lead times in shipbuilding, those vessels only now are being delivered by the hundreds — into a very different, much less robust international economy than when they were ordered.

For the shipping industry, the glut means not only lower charter fares, but also steep declines in the value of their vessels. The bigger losers, though, could eventually be some big European banks, many of which are already struggling with big losses on their holdings of government bonds from Greece, Italy and other heavily indebted European nations.

Basil Karatzas, the chief executive of Karatzas Marine Advisors, a ship brokerage and finance advisory firm in Manhattan, estimated that European banks hold about $500 billion in shipping loans on their books and face nearly $100 billion in losses to restructure them.

Just as American banks have grappled with huge loan losses for houses that are worth less than their mortgages, European banks face tens of billions of dollars in potential losses on shipping loans.

The banks’ “biggest concern is what is the write-off, and how do you treat it from an accounting point of view,” Mr. Karatzas said. “They do not know how to deal with these losses.”

Banks in Europe have long been the world leaders in ship financing because many of the biggest fleet owners are based there. But many have abruptly stopped lending money to shipowners. Some, as they scramble to muster capital to meet tougher reserve requirements demanded by European banking regulators, have even tried to raise money by asking some shipowners to prepay loans in exchange for a discount.

There is a scant secondary market for ship loans right now, except at deep discounts that banks are loath to agree to, according to shipping finance experts. Even for loans on which the vessel is still worth more than the mortgage, these experts say, the discount demanded is about 20 percent.

Commerzbank in Germany and the Lloyds Banking Group in Britain are among European institutions that have publicly said they were reducing their exposure to shipping loans.

Société Générale in France also has been looking for ways to reduce its holdings of shipping loans and instead focus on providing financial advice to shipping companies, according to two people with knowledge of the bank’s moves.

The bank declined to provide a comment on its shipping exposure ahead of the release of its annual financial report next month.

Shipowners, meantime, are nervously monitoring an industry benchmark, the Baltic Dry Index of bulk freighter charter rates, which has lost more than half its value since the start of the year. The index is now at its lowest level since January 2009, during the depths of the economic downturn after the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers.

And as charter rates plummet, so do prices of the vessels themselves. A large tanker that sold for $137 million in early 2008, the Samho Dream, was repossessed by bankers late last year and sold last week in Hong Kong for just $28.3 million.

The world’s tonnage of large freighters is climbing by more than 10 percent a year, with 1,650 large freighters for bulk commodities expected to emerge from shipyards this year alone.

As long as the shipped tonnage of world trade is creeping up at an annual rate of only 2 to 3 percent a year, the oversupply can only grow more burdensome for the seaborne freight industry.

Making the glut especially acute right now is the fact that shipyards have delivered a large number of vessels to owners since the beginning of the year. Just as some car buyers wait to buy a car at the start of a model year — because it will hold its resale value longer — shipowners have traditionally taken delivery of as many vessels as possible in January, so as to have a full calendar year’s use before a vessel celebrates its first birthday, said Natasha Boyden, an analyst at Cantor Fitzgerald in New York.

Buyers who might be tempted to refuse delivery of vessels can lose their deposits, which are typically up to 40 percent of the contract price of the ship. But it is getting harder to borrow money from struggling banks to pay for the remaining 60 percent — particularly with resale values now much lower than the prices at which contracts were signed four or five years ago.

Freight rates are now close to operating costs for many bulk freighters, leaving almost nothing to pay the mortgage, so more old vessels may be scrapped in the coming years, which would eventually reduce oversupply.

Worldwide lending for ships totaled about $100 billion last year, down only slightly from previous years, according to industry estimates. But as much as three-quarters of last year’s loans were to refinance or restructure previous loans that the borrowers were struggling to repay, shipping finance executives said.

One big question is whether the plunge in freight rates might also signal further trouble in the global economy. World oil demand has been fairly flat lately because of weak economic growth, so there has been limited need for more tankers to haul oil.

The biggest market for bulk carriers lies in carrying iron ore to China’s voracious steel mills. But with a real estate slowdown in China undermining demand for steel, the annual growth rate of Chinese iron ore imports has abruptly slowed since October.

Harley Seyedin, the president of the American Chamber of Commerce in South China, said that many construction projects had slowed to a crawl, with barely enough work being done for developers to persuade their bankers to continue financing projects already under way.

Yet the growing glut of vessels, combined with seasonal factors, could skew the reliability of shipping as a global economic indicator. Bad weather lately off Australia and Brazil, the two countries where bulk freighters are most likely to take on iron ore and other cargo, has made companies leery of chartering vessels and risk waiting for days for ports to reopen after storms.

Further confusing the picture is that the cost to ship a container from China to the United States or Europe actually jumped in the first two weeks of this year, as factories rushed to fill orders before shutting down for up to a month for the Chinese New Year, which began Monday. But that could be a misleading metric, because container rates temporarily surge every year for the last sailings before the Chinese New Year.

Even if world trade does not slow in the coming months, the shipping industry still has a long way to go before cargo demand can possibly catch up to capacity. Meantime, bulk freighters, container ships, tankers and refrigerator ships by the hundreds may continue to bob idly in the waves here, their hulls showing wide bands of paint that would be submerged if the vessels were fully laden.

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/business/global/the-global-downturn-weighs-on-shipowners-and-european-banks.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&ref=global

Thursday, November 10, 2011

Shipping: Economies of scale made steel

ABOARD one of the world’s largest container ships, moving almost imperceptibly through the seas off Vietnam, it’s easy to appreciate the economies of scale that allow a T-shirt made in China to be sent to the Netherlands for just 2.5 cents.

The Eleonora Maersk and the other seven ships in her class are among the biggest ever built: almost 400m long, or the length of four football pitches, and another half-pitch across. The ship can carry 7,500 or so 40-foot containers, each of which can hold 70,000 T-shirts. On the voyage your correspondent took, the Eleonora was carrying Europe’s New Year celebrations: 1,850 tonnes of fireworks, including 30 tonnes of gunpowder.

To move all this cargo from China to Europe in just over three weeks, the Eleonora boasts the largest internal-combustion engine ever built, as powerful as 1,000 family cars. This engine turns the longest propeller shaft (130m) ever made, at the end of which is the largest propeller, at 130 tonnes. Yet the ship is so automated that it requires a mere 13 people to crew it. Reassuringly, most captains prefer to take a few more.

Maersk Lines, the world’s biggest container-shipping company and owner of the Eleonora, is betting that, given the current economics of world trade, the only way to go is yet bigger. In February it announced an order for 20 even larger ships with a capacity of 18,000 twenty-foot-equivalent units (TEUs), the standard measure of container size. (The Eleonora can carry a mere 15,000.) The new ships will cost $200m each. And judging by this year’s order books, Maersk’s example will be followed by others. Singapore’s Neptune Orient Lines has ordered ten vessels of 14,000 TEUs; Orient Overseas Container Line has ordered ten of 13,000 TEUs. This is excellent news for South Korean shipyards (see article).

Most of these vessels will be designed for the Europe-Asia run—now the world’s busiest trade route. Given the rising price of fuel, many shippers think they need huge ships to turn a profit. Fears of a renewed slowdown in global trade accelerate the rush to find economies of scale.

Freight rates have plummeted in recent months, thanks to weakening demand and an oversupply of container ships, many of them ordered in the optimistic years before 2008. Freight rates on the Europe-Asia run are now below $700 per TEU, less than half the peak a year ago. At this price, says Janet Lewis, an analyst at Macquarie, a bank, “It’s hard for any container company to be making any cash.”

Recent financial results bear this out. On November 9th Maersk said its container business had lost $297m in the latest quarter. Neptune posted a third-quarter loss of $91m, having made a profit of $282m a year earlier. Japan’s “K” Line reported a loss of $239m on its container-shipping unit in the fiscal first half. And things could get a lot worse.

Companies are searching for new strategies to differentiate themselves from rivals, or merely to survive. Maersk has launched what it calls the “Daily Maersk” service on the China-Europe run, deploying 70 vessels to promise daily deliveries to Felixstowe, Bremerhaven and Rotterdam, the three main European container ports. The firm is hoping to deliver 95% of these containers on time, up from 80% for its own service on that route. This would be far higher than the industry average of about 65%. If a container arrives more than a day late, Maersk pledges to compensate the customer. Orient Overseas, by contrast, is focusing on the quality of its cargo-handling. It charges more, for example, to ship perishable items, such as blood plasma.

Given the stormy waters that may well be ahead, it seems likely that shippers will seek economies of scale not only from bigger ships but also from mergers. The industry is too crowded, many analysts believe. Smaller firms may soon be swallowed like containers vanishing into the hold of the Eleonora Maersk.

Source: http://www.economist.com/node/21538156